Probe whether AI recommenders mention your product for a category query, then copy Schema.org JSON-LD and FAQ Markdown. Directional snapshots — not a ranking guarantee.
Required fields on the left
Live AI probe is on. Other engines show as coming soon. Results are snapshots — not ranking guarantees. Requires DEEPSEEK_API_KEY. After a miss, publish numbers and sources a model can quote. Optional next: schema builder, llms.txt (ignored by Google Search), citation checker.
Appears after you run
Audit AI brand visibility
Enter your product and category to see whether AI recommenders mention you — then copy Schema.org JSON-LD and FAQ Markdown.
A GEO brand audit checks whether generative assistants mention your product for a category question. GEO itself is making content easy to retrieve, understand, and justify — definitions, facts, sources, dates — so an engine can cite you. It is not putting llms.txt on the site. One probe is a snapshot, not a ranking guarantee.
Classic SEO and GEO overlap. Google’s May 2026 Search Central guide says AI Overviews and AI Mode are rooted in ordinary ranking and quality systems, not secret AI markup. Crawlable pages, named entities, and unique facts help both. A #1 blue link still does not guarantee a mention in an assistant answer.
Google Search Central, May 2026, “Optimizing your website for generative AI features on Google Search”: ignore llms.txt and other special AI markup for Google Search. Checked 19 August 2026.
Google’s May 2026 Search Central guide states that generative AI features on Google Search are rooted in core ranking and quality systems. For Google Search you can ignore llms.txt and other “special” AI markup — Google Search does not use them. Foundational SEO and unique, citable content still apply.
You also cannot manufacture authority from this site alone. Citation-oriented systems often prefer independent references. Genuine third-party mentions — docs, press, papers, forums that you did not astroturf — matter more than another OmniKit page saying OmniKit is useful. Google’s same guide says inauthentic “mentions” are not a useful tactic.
Enter product name, category, and key features. Run the live probe. Read whether you were mentioned. Copy JSON-LD and FAQ Markdown if you need a clearer entity page. Re-audit after you publish — a single run is directional only.
Enter product name, category, and key features.
Run the GEO audit against the live AI probe.
Copy JSON-LD and FAQ Markdown into your site if the entity page is thin.
Publish citable facts (formula, inputs, source, date, result). llms.txt is optional.
Classic SEO is blue-link rankings. GEO is whether assistants can retrieve, understand, and justify a claim about you — then mention or cite it. They share headings, entities, and useful pages. They are not the same outcome: winning Google’s ten blue links does not guarantee a mention in an AI answer, and llms.txt is not the difference.
No. You can publish definitions, original numbers, methodology, and citations so a model has something to quote. Citation-oriented systems still often prefer independent sources. Eventually you need genuine third-party mentions — docs, press, papers, forums you did not astroturf. Google’s same guide says inauthentic mentions are not a useful tactic.
No. Google’s Search Central guide (checked 19 August 2026) says generative AI features on Google Search do not use llms.txt or other special AI markup. You can ignore that file for Google Search. ChatGPT also will not start recommending you because you hosted a text file. Publish numbers, sources, and pages other people can cite.
A miss usually means the model lacks a clean entity, your category language does not match how people ask, or competitors appear more often in training and retrieval. It is not a permanent verdict. Publish true Product or Organization schema, answer the category question on the page, then probe again.
This audit asks whether assistants recommend the brand for a category. Citation Draft Checker scores the article text you paste. AI Citation Checker simulates a query-level cite. Use the audit for brand presence. Use citation tools when you are improving a specific URL.
A GEO brand audit checks whether generative assistants mention your product for a category question. GEO itself is making content easy to retrieve, understand, and justify — definitions, facts, sources, dates — so an engine can cite you. It is not putting llms.txt on the site. One probe is a snapshot, not a ranking guarantee.
GEO is making content easy to retrieve, understand, and justify so assistants can cite you | definitions, facts, sources, dates | not a secret markup file. It is related to, but distinct from, classic blue-link SEO.
No. Results are directional snapshots that vary by prompt, model, and time.
A live AI probe is available. Other providers show as stubs until adapters ship.
Keep measuring in the same cluster — or jump to the next decision.
Run a GEO audit when you care whether assistants mention you for a category question. A miss is a snapshot. Publish definitions, numbers, methodology, and sources a model can quote. Schema can clarify an entity. llms.txt will not make ChatGPT recommend you. Authority still needs genuine third-party mentions.
